That makes sense Sean. Go for it. S On Sat, Aug 11, 2018, 5:05 PM Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote:
> Mind if I do the announcement? Would like to include some expectations for > those still on the current stable line. > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2018, 11:21 Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > Bumping this thread. Seems like there is no objection upping the stable > > pointer to 1.4. I'll move it on Tuesday unless push back (and announce > on > > user@). > > > > Thanks, > > > > S > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:33 AM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Even when claiming a code line stable we can call out specific features > > as > > > experimental, and have done so in the past. Some examples: > > > - encryption > > > - HFileV3 > > > - ZK-less assignment > > > > > > My thinking is in 1.4 RSGroups is the experimental feature, and in 1.5 > it > > > will be storage class aware file placement. > > > > > > If the relevant section of documentation doesn't already claim this > > status > > > for the feature it should. > > > > > > > > > On Mar 13, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Francis Christopher Liu < > > > toffer....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> I think Francis Liu might be wanting to make more releases of 1.3. > If > > > so, > > > > and for as long as he wants to do it, we shouldn't mark it EOM > > obviously. > > > > > > > > Thanks! Yes, I'd like to continue cutting releases for 1.3 as long as > > we > > > > are on it which may be a while. > > > > > > > >> As for moving the stable pointer to 1.4, I think we have consensus > to > > do > > > > it, > > > > > > > > Since regionserver groups is one of the big features for 1.4. I'm > > > wondering > > > > are we marking the feature as stable as well? I haven't had the > chance > > to > > > > review it or try it was hoping to get to it before that happens. > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:58 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> +1 on moving the stable pointer, but before that, I'd suggest some > > > >> notification in our @user mailing list. According to our 1.x usage > > > survey > > > >> <https://s.apache.org/1wVL> Andrew took last month, we have 47% > usage > > > on > > > >> 1.2 and 22% on 1.3, JFYI. > > > >> > > > >> Best Regards, > > > >> Yu > > > >> > > > >>> On 10 March 2018 at 06:10, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> I think Francis Liu might be wanting to make more releases of 1.3. > If > > > so, > > > >>> and for as long as he wants to do it, we shouldn't mark it EOM > > > obviously. > > > >>> > > > >>> As for moving the stable pointer to 1.4, I think we have consensus > to > > > do > > > >>> it, and if the RM for 1.2 wants to move on and declare it EOM in > > about > > > >> six > > > >>> months, at that time if not sooner we will have to do it anyway. > > > >>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Hi folks! > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I've been working to get the test suite back to green on > > branch-1.2; > > > >>>>> we have a lot of branches to track backport for and a non-trivial > > > >>>>> amount of tech debt across all of them from the nightlies being > > > >>>>> offline. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> After the stable pointer moves forward from branch-1.2 I'll keep > > > >> doing > > > >>>>> RM duty for it for ~6 months. Ideally I'd be doing monthly > > releases, > > > >>>>> but that will largely depend on keeping the build green. After > > that, > > > >>>>> it'd go EOM. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> What do y'all think about moving the stable pointer to branch-1.4 > > as > > > >>>>> of the 1.4.2 release? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> If we move the stable pointer directly to 1.4 and skip over 1.3, > > what > > > >>>>> do folks think about marking it EOM after we get a 1.3.2 release > > out? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Makes sense to me. Interested in Andrew's take. > > > >>>> S > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Best regards, > > > >>> Andrew > > > >>> > > > >>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > > truth's > > > >>> decrepit hands > > > >>> - A23, Crosstalk > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >
