On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > HBASE-20188 is comparing latest 2.0 to our stable pointer 1.2.7, and there > seems to be no conclusion yet, JFYI. While yes I believe more numbers could > give us a broader view :-) > > Yeah, what Yu Li says above. As is, hbase2 is much better than hbase1 under mixed loading but does worse when pure read or write workloads.
> And I'm not sure but is performance regression some kind of a blocker for > the release? Thanks. > > I'd imagine that if the difference were large, then yes, it should be a blocker -- or we as a community can decide to work on it in a follow-on release making perf a priority (say, 2.1.0). Thanks, S > Best Regards, > Yu > > On 11 April 2018 at 08:39, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Do we have a ITBLL result and also some performance numbers? I could help > > getting some performance numbers comparing to the version we use... > > > > 2018-04-11 5:50 GMT+08:00 Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org>: > > > > > no compat report in the RC directory. does that mean we won't have one > > > in the dist area? > > > > > > > > > not a blocker; we've been inconsistent on it in prior releases, but > > > the trend seemed to be towards including it. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > The first release candidate for Apache HBase 2.0.0 is available for > > > > downloading and testing. > > > > > > > > Artifacts are available here: > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0RC0/ > > > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available in the staging repository at: > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapachehbase-1209 > > > > > > > > All artifacts are signed with my signing key 8ACC93D2, which is also > > > > in the project KEYS file at > > > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS > > > > > > > > These artifacts were tagged 2.0.0RC0 at > > > > hash 011dd2dae33456b3a2bcc2513e9fdd29de23be46 > > > > > > > > Please review 'Upgrading from 1.x to 2.x' in the bundled HBase 2.0.0 > > > > Reference Guide before installing or upgrading for a list of > > > > incompatibilities, major changes, and notable new features. Be aware > > that > > > > according to our adopted Semantic Versioning guidelines[1], we've > allow > > > > ourselves to make breaking changes in this major version release. For > > > > example, Coprocessors will need to be recast to fit more constrained > CP > > > > APIs and a rolling upgrade of an hbase-1.x install to hbase-2.x > without > > > > downtime is (currently) not possible. That said, a bunch of effort > has > > > been > > > > expended mitigating differences; a hbase-1.x client can perform DML > > > against > > > > an hbase-2 cluster. > > > > > > > > For the full list of ~6k issues addressed, see [2]. There are also > > > > CHANGES.md and RELEASENOTES.md in the root directory of the source > > > tarball. > > > > > > > > Please take a few minutes to verify the release and vote on releasing > > it: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HBase 2.0.0 > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > > > > > This VOTE will run for one week and close Tuesday, April 17, 2018 @ > > 13:00 > > > > PST. > > > > > > > > Thanks to the myriad who have helped out with this release, > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > > > > > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/2.0/book.html#hbase.versioning.post10 > > > > 2. https://s.apache.org/zwS9 > > > > > >
