> I don't see why we'd treat them different from any other members. The rule "If a class is not annotated with one of these, it is assumed to be a InterfaceAudience.Private class." is in hbase docs. Perhaps we should revise this description?
On 2018/05/22 14:03:04, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ah, so maybe this is just YETUS-628 "Class level InterfaceAudience is > >> not applied to internal classes/enums" ? > > > > I didn't trace YETUS-628. But, ya the concept of YETUS-628 is same to me. > > Nevertheless, seems our docs haven't mentioned the such definition to > > nested class. If we can reach the consensus on the new rule, it is worth > > putting it in hbase docs. > > > > > I don't see why we'd treat them different from any other members. >
