Grand. I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20934. Let me
have a go at making the easy one work first (the kafka proxy). Lets see how
it goes. I'll report back here.
S

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:43 PM Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:

> Key functionality for the project's adoption should be in the project.
> Please do not suggest we donate things to Bahir.
>
> I apologize if this is brisk. I have had previous negative experiences
> with folks that span our communities trying to move work I spent a lot
> of time contributing to within HBase over to Bahir in an attempt to
> bypass an agreed upon standard of quality.
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Artem Ervits <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Why not just donating the connector to http://bahir.apache.org/ ?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 12:51 PM Lars Francke <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'd love to have the Kafka Connector included.
> >>
> >> @Mike thanks so much for the contribution (and your planned ones)
> >>
> >> I'm +1 on adding it to the core but I'm also +1 on having a separate
> >> repository under Apache governance
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 to the great point by Duo about use of non-IA.Public classes
> >> >
> >> > +1 for Apache for the governance (although, I wouldn't care if we use
> >> > Github PRs to try to encourage more folks to contribute), a repo with
> the
> >> > theme of "connectors" (to include Thrift, REST, and the like). Spark
> too
> >> --
> >> > I think we had suggested that prior, but it could be a mental
> invention
> >> of
> >> > mine..
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 7/24/18 10:16 AM, Hbase Janitor wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi everyone,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm the author of the patch.  A separate repo for all the connectors
> is
> >> a
> >> >> great idea! I can make whatever changes necessary to the patch to
> help.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have several other integration type projects like this planned.
> >> >>
> >> >> Mike
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 00:03 Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I would be ok with all of the connectors in a single repo. Doing a
> repo
> >> >>> per
> >> >>> connector seems like a large amount of overhead work.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 9:12 PM Clay B. <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [Non-binding]
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I am all for the Kafka Connect(er) as indeed it makes HBase "more
> >> >>>> relevant" and generates buzz to help me sell HBase adoption in my
> >> >>>> endeavors.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also, I would like to see a connectors repo a lot as I would
> expect it
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> can
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> make the HBase source and releases more obvious in what is
> changing.
> >> Not
> >> >>>> to distract from Kafka, but Spark has in the past been a hang-up
> and
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> seems
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> a good fit in such a repo too; as such, I would prefer Apache over
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> GitHub.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -Clay
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Would we make a new repo called hbase-connectors and move REST,
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> thrift,
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> and this new patch there?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I like this idea. We are already releasing hbase-thirdparty like
> >> this.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:47 PM Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> (Thanks for the good discussion)
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Where we think  'outside of HBase' would be?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Github seems too 'remote' from project and from Apache? Would we
> >> make
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> a
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> new
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> repo called hbase-connectors and move REST, thrift, and this new
> >> patch
> >> >>>>>> there?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>> S
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I'm -0 for including this into the main hbase tree. I feel like
> >> we've
> >> >>>>>>> made a bit of progress in cleaning up our core, and this
> strikes me
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> as
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> a
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> step in the wrong direction.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> At the same time, the integration seems nice enough (for the
> same
> >> >>>>>>> reasons Andrew points out). Is there a reason this couldn't
> exist
> >> >>>>>>> outside of HBase (at the ASF or otherwise)? Given a quick
> glance at
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> the
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> patch, it would be quite trivial to keep separate (just requires
> some
> >> >>>>>>> heavier scripting to get it off the ground that the HBase
> scripts
> >> do
> >> >>>>>>> setup for). I feel like that will decrease our debt while we
> see if
> >> >>>>>>> people start using it. Our API should be more than stable
> enough to
> >> >>>>>>> prevent any worry about drift happening from core to this
> project.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On 7/23/18 6:35 PM, Stack wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> We have a very nice contrib sitting up in HBASE-15320 which
> via a
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> proxy
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> so minimal dependencies -- adds source and sink for Kafka
> Connect.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> It
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> is
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> nicely contained inside two new hbase-kafka-* modules.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> We good w/ taking on this new feature?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> It looks good to me. Check it out up on HBASE-15320. I was
> going
> >> to
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> commit
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> to tip of branch-2 so it'd show up in hbase-2.2.x unless you
> all
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> want
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> some
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> backporting action going on.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> S
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Best regards,
> >> >>>>> Andrew
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> >> truth's
> >> >>>>> decrepit hands
> >> >>>>>    - A23, Crosstalk
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to