should -1 only apply with a valid critical Jira in hand? On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:41 PM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
> .. a code base to the RM role. I don't believe vetos for RCs for flaky > tests should be considered valid reason to vote -1. I think we may be > erring toward excessively maximal interpretation of compatibility > guidelines in some cases. At any rate, where does the responsibility lie > for fixing the issues? And do voters consider the personal cost to the RM > in terms of time and attention in rolling the RC when deciding to vote -1? > The -1 vote has a cost. It requires the RM to restart the RC. My impression > is this isn't a consideration. > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:37 AM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > /cc private@ > > > > I believe you are pushing your collective burden as a group of committers > > sharing responsiblity to > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:33 AM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> My experience with the last four RC attempts I have made has been just a > >> constant stream of vetos for flaky tests which I can't reproduce (at > least > >> not with the usual 10 iterations of the suite) and possibly pedantic > >> compatability report interpretations with no patches to help and in some > >> cases not even JIRAs filed to follow up on specifying the complaint. > Life > >> is too short to waste time and effort like this. > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > > decrepit hands > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >
