Let me try the TestJMXConnectorServer locally again, although it failed now, it should not effect the rc vote. Give my +1, will take a look about that UT.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 3:15 PM OpenInx <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Signature: ok > * Checksum : ok > * Rat check (1.8.0_202): ok > - mvn clean apache-rat:check > * Built from source (1.8.0_202): ok > - mvn clean install -DskipTests > * Unit tests pass (1.8.0_202): failed > - mvn test -P runAllTests > > The failed UT are: > > [INFO] > [ERROR] Errors: > [ERROR] > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestJMXConnectorServer.testHMConnectorServerWhenShutdownCluster(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestJMXConnectorServer) > [ERROR] Run 1: > TestJMXConnectorServer.testHMConnectorServerWhenShutdownCluster:154 » IO > Shutt... > [ERROR] Run 2: TestJMXConnectorServer.tearDown:73 NullPointer > [INFO] > [ERROR] > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestJMXConnectorServer.testHMConnectorServerWhenStopMaster(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestJMXConnectorServer) > [ERROR] Run 1: > TestJMXConnectorServer.testHMConnectorServerWhenStopMaster:85 » IO Shutting > do... > [ERROR] Run 2: TestJMXConnectorServer.tearDown:73 NullPointer > [INFO] > [ERROR] > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestJMXConnectorServer.testRSConnectorServerWhenStopRegionServer(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestJMXConnectorServer) > [ERROR] Run 1: > TestJMXConnectorServer.testRSConnectorServerWhenStopRegionServer:123 » IO > Shut... > [ERROR] Run 2: TestJMXConnectorServer.tearDown:73 NullPointer > [INFO] > [WARNING] Flakes: > [WARNING] > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestRestartCluster.testRetainAssignmentOnRestart(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestRestartCluster) > [ERROR] Run 1: TestRestartCluster.testRetainAssignmentOnRestart:170 » > Runtime Failed construc... > [INFO] Run 2: PASS > [INFO] > [WARNING] > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.cleaner.TestSnapshotFromMaster.testAsyncSnapshotWillNotBlockSnapshotHFileCleaner(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.cleaner.TestSnapshotFromMaster) > [ERROR] Run 1: > TestSnapshotFromMaster.testAsyncSnapshotWillNotBlockSnapshotHFileCleaner:445 > [INFO] Run 2: PASS > [INFO] > [WARNING] > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationTrackerZKImpl.testGetListOfRegionServers(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationTrackerZKImpl) > [ERROR] Run 1: > TestReplicationTrackerZKImpl.testGetListOfRegionServers:130 expected:<1> > but was:<2> > [INFO] Run 2: PASS > [INFO] > [INFO] > [ERROR] Tests run: 4068, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 48, Flakes: 3 > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 12:52 AM Artem Ervits <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm not replacing any jars, deploying as is. I did check, branch-2.1 is >> based on Hadoop 2.7.7. that was my next step, will redeploy >> pseudodistributed cluster with 2.7 instead of 2.8, or recompile HBase with >> 2.8.5. probably latter. >> >> Thanks Duo. >> >> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019, 8:51 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > So how do you start the hbase cluster? Replace the hadoop jars with >> 2.8.5? >> > Usually this will not work, you need to recompile from source and set >> the >> > hadoop version to 2.8.5. And also, you do not need to change the client >> > hadoop library only if you want to use a HDFS cluster with higher >> version. >> > The 2.7.x DFSClient can communicate with HDFS with higher version. >> > >> > Maybe we should add this to our ref guide... >> > >> > Artem Ervits <[email protected]> 于2019年8月17日周六 下午8:23写道： >> > >> > > +0 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > Deployed on 2.8.5 pseudodistributed: NOK >> > > Ran into issue similar to [1] >> > > >> > > Will retry with 2.7 on Monday unless vote changes by then. >> > > >> > > hbase-vote script: OK, profile for tests used runSmallTests >> > > >> > > [1] >> > > >> > > >> > >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53106952/starting-hbase-java-lang-classnotfoundexception-org-apache-htrace-samplerbuild >> > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 11:10 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Reminder, we still need at least one more vote. >> > > > >> > > > Peter Somogyi <[email protected]>于2019年8月15日 周四23:09写道： >> > > > >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > * Signature, checksum: ok >> > > > > * Rat check: ok >> > > > > * Unit tests: ok >> > > > > * Compatibility report: ok >> > > > > * Release notes, changes: ok >> > > > > * LTT 1M rows: ok >> > > > > * Basic shell commands in standalone mode: ok >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:15 PM Duo Zhang <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > The first release candidate for HBase 2.1.6 is available for >> > > download: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.1.6RC0 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in a staging repository at: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1329/ >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Artifacts are signed with my key (9AD2AE49) published in our >> KEYS >> > > file >> > > > at >> > > > > > >> > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The tag to be voted on is 2.1.6RC0: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hbase/tree/2.1.6RC0 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > HBase 2.1.6 is the seventh maintenance release in the HBase 2.1 >> > line, >> > > > > > continuing on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database >> to >> > > the >> > > > > > Hadoop and NoSQL communities. It fixes several CVEs related to >> > > jackson >> > > > by >> > > > > > upgrading jackson-databind dependency to 2.9.9.2, all hbase >> users >> > are >> > > > > > highly recommended to upgrade, especially the one who uses >> > > hbase-rest. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 2.1.6 includes ~127 bug and improvement fixes done since the >> 2.1.5. >> > > > There >> > > > > > are several critical fixes around WAL, which may cause WAL >> > corruption >> > > > or >> > > > > > hang the region server. Please see HBASE-22539, HBASE-22681, >> > > > HBASE-22684 >> > > > > > for more details. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 2.1.5 has >> > been >> > > > > > published for your review, at: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.1.6RC0/compatibility_report_2.1.5vs2.1.6RC0.html >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The report shows no incompatibilities. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The full list of fixes included in this release is available in >> the >> > > > > > CHANGES.md that ships as part of the release also available >> here: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.1.6RC0/CHANGES.md >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The RELEASENOTES.md are here: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.1.6RC0/RELEASENOTES.md >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +1/-1 on whether we >> should >> > > > release >> > > > > > these artifacts as HBase 2.1.6. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
