+1, much easier and available. On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:56 AM Geoffrey Jacoby <gjac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), GitHub is a much better user experience, for both > reviewers and contributors > > Geoffrey. > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 5:48 AM Guangxu Cheng <guangxuch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > It will be more convenient to use Github PR. > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月14日周四 下午6:17写道： > > > > > +1, ReviewBoard is almost dead now as it is only available to > > > committers... > > > > > > Jan Hentschel <jan.hentsc...@ultratendency.com> 于2019年11月14日周四 > 下午6:11写道： > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > I also like the GitHub way much more compared to ReviewBoard. > > > > > > > > From: Peter Somogyi <psomo...@apache.org> > > > > Reply-To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> > > > > Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 at 6:23 PM > > > > To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate Review Board in favor of Github > > reviews > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Another issue with ReviewBoard is that it requires Apache ID so only > > > > committers are able to create new reviews or even comment. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:21 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org > > > <mailto: > > > > ndimi...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > > > Seems in the old days we were explicitly non-strict about where code > > > review > > > > were happening. I remember bouncing between Review Board and a > > > Phabricator > > > > instance (in addition to in-line patch reviews on JIRA). Now that we > > have > > > > this fancy Gitbox and integration with GitHub, it seems we're making > a > > > > strong statement toward using Github PRs (in addition to in-line > patch > > > > reviews on JIRA) for our code review system. Is it worth while > > supporting > > > > those older tools? I think maintaining the developer support tooling > > > around > > > > just these two mechanisms is plenty to keep up with. > > > > > > > > I propose we make the move to Github PR's "official". This > > > > basically involves updating the tome (here [0], here [1], probably > > > others) > > > > accordingly and sweeping the `dev-support` dir for old scripts. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > [0]: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#developing > > > > [1]: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#reviewboard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
