+1 for moving stable pointer to 2.2.3 Side note: I'm not sure whether adding a new stable-1 pointer is a good idea, does it mean that "if users still don't want to go 2.x we suggest 1.4.11"? Maybe worth another thread for discussion to keep this thread on track (smile).
Best Regards, Yu On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 21:16, Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月18日周六 下午9:04写道： > > > OK, so let's wait for 72 hours, if no objections I will change the stable > > pointer. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> 于2020年1月18日周六 上午3:14写道： > > > > > FWIW I don't think we need a VOTE on this; consensus has been shown > > across > > > several discussion threads. > > > > > > all the same, +1 from me. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:42 AM Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > We have discussed this several times in the past, this is the most > > recent > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f9ae2bf212d4d1c48eecf3d1d26edb0dd3d1d3bb8096bf6740839dbe%40%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > And seems the consensus is to move the stable pointer to 2.2.x. > > > > > > > > So here I want to call a vote, to officially move the stable pointer > to > > > > 2.2.3, and create a new stable-1 pointer to point to 1.4.11. > > > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > Please vote > > > > > > > > [+1] Agree > > > > [-1] Disagree (please include actionable feedback) > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > >
