+1 from me, so anyway we have 4 binding +1s.

Let me change the stble pointer then.

On the stable-1, I think we can have one for now. Sean promised he will do
the 1.x releases at least for about half a year after we move the stable
pointer to 2.x, so I think we can discuss whether to remove the stable-1
pointer after that.

Thanks.

Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月20日周一 下午2:26写道:

> +1 for moving stable pointer to 2.2.3
>
> Side note: I'm not sure whether adding a new stable-1 pointer is a good
> idea, does it mean that "if users still don't want to go 2.x we suggest
> 1.4.11"? Maybe worth another thread for discussion to keep this thread on
> track (smile).
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 21:16, Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月18日周六 下午9:04写道:
> >
> > > OK, so let's wait for 72 hours, if no objections I will change the
> stable
> > > pointer.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> 于2020年1月18日周六 上午3:14写道:
> > >
> > > > FWIW I don't think we need a VOTE on this; consensus has been shown
> > > across
> > > > several discussion threads.
> > > >
> > > > all the same, +1 from me.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:42 AM Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We have discussed this several times in the past, this is the most
> > > recent
> > > > > one
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f9ae2bf212d4d1c48eecf3d1d26edb0dd3d1d3bb8096bf6740839dbe%40%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And seems the consensus is to move the stable pointer to 2.2.x.
> > > > >
> > > > > So here I want to call a vote, to officially move the stable
> pointer
> > to
> > > > > 2.2.3, and create a new stable-1 pointer to point to 1.4.11.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote
> > > > >
> > > > > [+1] Agree
> > > > > [-1] Disagree (please include actionable feedback)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to