I agree in principle that excluding 100s of UTs isn't good. But we don't really have better options given the state of tests and testing hardware currently available to us.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 19:14 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the problem is all UTs are failing randomly... > > And it is also not a good idea to exclude hundreds of UTs in pre commit? > > Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2020年3月4日周三 上午9:11写道： > > > Everything in the flake list should be skipped at precommit time. Is that > > not happening? > > > > Are we keeping a shorter flake window so things are bouncing in and out > of > > the list? > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 18:56 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I see recently there are lots of 'flaky tests' related issues been > > resolved > > > but seems the situation is getting worse? For branch-2.2 the flaky page > > is > > > fine, but for master it is totally a mess... > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/job/branch-2.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/job/master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html > > > > > > Lots of UTs are in trouble and it makes it really hard to pass the pre > > > commit check which means it is really hard to contribute to the > > project... > > > > > > We need to fix this soon... > > > > > >
