But why branch-2.2 and branch-2.1 are still fine? Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2020年3月4日周三 上午9:24写道：
> I agree in principle that excluding 100s of UTs isn't good. But we don't > really have better options given the state of tests and testing hardware > currently available to us. > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 19:14 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think the problem is all UTs are failing randomly... > > > > And it is also not a good idea to exclude hundreds of UTs in pre commit? > > > > Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2020年3月4日周三 上午9:11写道： > > > > > Everything in the flake list should be skipped at precommit time. Is > that > > > not happening? > > > > > > Are we keeping a shorter flake window so things are bouncing in and out > > of > > > the list? > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 18:56 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > I see recently there are lots of 'flaky tests' related issues been > > > resolved > > > > but seems the situation is getting worse? For branch-2.2 the flaky > page > > > is > > > > fine, but for master it is totally a mess... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/job/branch-2.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/job/master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html > > > > > > > > Lots of UTs are in trouble and it makes it really hard to pass the > pre > > > > commit check which means it is really hard to contribute to the > > > project... > > > > > > > > We need to fix this soon... > > > > > > > > > >
