One is 'Compaction' Server, the other is 'Replication' Server, not the same :)
Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月14日周五 14:07写道： > > Thanks. Will need to update the fix versions on those issues then. > > So then the question is why do we have two competing branches for the same > feature? What is the path forward? How do we choose one over the other? Or is > it complimentary work? (doubtful) > > > > On Oct 13, 2022, at 10:19 PM, 张铎 <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think the fix versions for the sub tasks of HBASE-24666 are > > incorrect. You can check the PRs, the target branch is HBASE-24666, > > not master. I'm not sure why some of the issues have fix versions set > > to 3.0.0-alpha-x... > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2022年10月14日周五 05:37写道： > >> > >> There are two (competing? complimentary?) umbrella issues for the > >> Compaction Server work-in progress: > >> > >> HBASE-24666: Offload the replication source/sink job to independent > >> Replication Server > >> > >> HBASE-25714: Offload the compaction job to independent Compaction Server > >> > >> First question: What is the relationship, if any, between these umbrellas > >> and their respective subtasks? > >> > >> Next, if I understand correctly, the HBASE-24666 changes were committed > >> into master branch; while the HBASE-25714 changes were committed into a > >> feature branch named after the JIRA issue. Is that correct? > >> > >> My understanding also is that the HBASE-24666 changes are ports of > >> something that is running in production somewhere. Does anyone know the > >> status of the HBASE-25714 changes in that regard? > >> > >> Finally, what should be the path forward here? From my quick look at the > >> state of things, HBASE-24666 is committed to master but needs polish before > >> it could be considered feature complete. There are open subtasks under the > >> umbrella that capture some of the missing things. Some comments on the > >> umbrella itself also indicate the design of coprocessor support in this > >> compaction server implementation has not yet been considered, which would > >> need to be added. It would make the most sense to me to continue the > >> HBASE-24666 work in master branch until completed. I reserve the right to > >> change this depending on answers to above questions or subsequent > >> discussion. > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Andrew
