Yeah, ok, It is obvious in retrospect, but thank you for pointing that out. I am not sure how I got them confused. Let me make sure there are no cross linked issues.
My interest is HBASE-25714 so will follow up there. On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:16 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > One is 'Compaction' Server, the other is 'Replication' Server, not the > same :) > > Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月14日周五 14:07写道： > > > > Thanks. Will need to update the fix versions on those issues then. > > > > So then the question is why do we have two competing branches for the > same feature? What is the path forward? How do we choose one over the > other? Or is it complimentary work? (doubtful) > > > > > > > On Oct 13, 2022, at 10:19 PM, 张铎 <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I think the fix versions for the sub tasks of HBASE-24666 are > > > incorrect. You can check the PRs, the target branch is HBASE-24666, > > > not master. I'm not sure why some of the issues have fix versions set > > > to 3.0.0-alpha-x... > > > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2022年10月14日周五 05:37写道： > > >> > > >> There are two (competing? complimentary?) umbrella issues for the > > >> Compaction Server work-in progress: > > >> > > >> HBASE-24666: Offload the replication source/sink job to independent > > >> Replication Server > > >> > > >> HBASE-25714: Offload the compaction job to independent Compaction > Server > > >> > > >> First question: What is the relationship, if any, between these > umbrellas > > >> and their respective subtasks? > > >> > > >> Next, if I understand correctly, the HBASE-24666 changes were > committed > > >> into master branch; while the HBASE-25714 changes were committed into > a > > >> feature branch named after the JIRA issue. Is that correct? > > >> > > >> My understanding also is that the HBASE-24666 changes are ports of > > >> something that is running in production somewhere. Does anyone know > the > > >> status of the HBASE-25714 changes in that regard? > > >> > > >> Finally, what should be the path forward here? From my quick look at > the > > >> state of things, HBASE-24666 is committed to master but needs polish > before > > >> it could be considered feature complete. There are open subtasks > under the > > >> umbrella that capture some of the missing things. Some comments on the > > >> umbrella itself also indicate the design of coprocessor support in > this > > >> compaction server implementation has not yet been considered, which > would > > >> need to be added. It would make the most sense to me to continue the > > >> HBASE-24666 work in master branch until completed. I reserve the > right to > > >> change this depending on answers to above questions or subsequent > > >> discussion. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best regards, > > >> Andrew >
