My understanding is some folks evaluating and polishing TLS for their production are also considering hbase-backup in the same way, which is why I linked them together. If that is incorrect then they both are still worth considering in my opinion but would have a more tenuous link.
Where we are with hbase-backup is it should probably be ported to where more people would be inclined to evaluate it, in order for it to make more progress. A new minor releasing line would fit. On the other hand if it is too unpolished then the experience would be poor. > On Oct 16, 2022, at 5:35 AM, 张铎 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe the second one is still ongoing? > > Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> 于2022年10月14日周五 05:37写道： >> >> We will begin releasing activity for the 2.6 code line and as a >> prerequisite to that we shall need to make a new branch branch-2.6 from >> branch-2. >> >> Before we do that let's make sure all commits for the key features of 2.6 >> are settled in branch-2 before the branching point. Those key features are: >> - mTLS RPC >> - hbase-backup backport >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Andrew
