Congratulations to everyone, especially the performers who implemented the
new framework!

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 11:07 AM Rushabh Shah
<[email protected]> wrote:

> With 3 +1 and no -1, we will merge this PR and will create a backport PR
> for branch-2. Thank you everyone.
>
>
> Rushabh Shah
>
>    - Software Engineering LMTS | Salesforce
>    -
>       - Mobile: 213 422 9052
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 7:18 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > After the recent update of the design and implementation, change my
> > vote to +1. Detailed can be found in the discussion on the PR.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4556
> >
> > So we have gotten 3 +1s for merging back the feature branch to master.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> 于2022年6月22日周三 12:10写道:
> >
> > >
> > > Left some comments on the PR.
> > >
> > > PTAL.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> 于2022年6月22日周三 10:08写道:
> > >>
> > >> Skimmed the design doc, I think it is a very useful feature for
> > detecting and debugging replication inconsistencies. Good job.
> > >>
> > >> And since the feature is default off, I'm optimistic that we can merge
> > it first and then keep polishing it in the future, as it will not affect
> > the normal write and replication flow.
> > >>
> > >> Let me take a look at the PR and report back here. The first
> suggestion
> > is that, please use lower case table names, as all our system tables are
> in
> > lower case :)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the great work.
> > >>
> > >> Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> 于2022年6月22日周三 06:29写道:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> > On Jun 21, 2022, at 10:07 AM, Rushabh Shah <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Hi everyone,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I'm writing this request to propose a merge of HBASE-26913[1]
> > "Replication
> > >>> > Observability Framework" to master and branch-2.
> > >>> > The goal is to persist replication related metadata to newly
> created
> > hbase
> > >>> > tables to reduce MTTD (Mean Time To Detect) and
> > >>> > MTTR (Mean Time To Repair) replication inconsistencies between
> > Primary and
> > >>> > DR clusters.
> > >>> > The design doc is here[2].
> > >>> >
> > >>> > We have created 2 new hbase tables, REPLICATION.WALEVENTTRACKER and
> > >>> > REPLICATION.SINK_TRACKER. The first table
> > >>> > will store all the WAL events (ACTIVE, ROLLING, ROLLED) along with
> > metadata
> > >>> > (wal name, wal length, region server name, timestamp)
> > >>> > from all region servers. We have introduced a new chore called
> > >>> > ReplicationMarkerChore which will create special marker/sentinel
> rows
> > >>> > periodically (which is configurable) and inject them directly to
> > WAL. This
> > >>> > marker rows will be handled specially and replicated to
> > >>> > sink cluster and will be persisted to REPLICATION.SINK_TRACKER
> table.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Highlights
> > >>> > * The entire feature is configurable. Defaults to false.
> > >>> > * A new section is added to the HBase book which covers the feature
> > and how
> > >>> > to use it.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > The vote will open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>> > Please vote:
> > >>> > [+1]    Merge the changes from HBASE-26913 to master/branch-2
> > >>> > [+/-0]  Neutral
> > >>> > [-1]    Disagree (please include actionable feedback)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26913
> > >>> > 2.
> > >>> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14oZ5ssY28hvJaQD_Jg9kWX7LfUKUyyU2PCA93PPzVko/edit#heading=h.9oum2kn0zj5r
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks,
> > >>> > Rushabh
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrew

Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
    It's what we’ve earned
Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
   - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse

Reply via email to