Tested locally, after removing hbase-example from tarball, the hadoop3 tarball is about 351MB.
So you could try to include this commit to publish again, to see if this helps. Thanks. 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2024年3月22日周五 09:18写道： > > If we exclude hbase-example from the binaries, will it be smaller enough to > fit? > > We already commit the changes to master I believe. Let me see if we > can cherry-pick them and commit to branch-2.6 as well. > > Thanks. > > Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@apache.org> 于2024年3月22日周五 07:35写道： > > > > Thanks, I filed > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25634 > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:46 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > The hadoop3 bin tarball for 2.5.8 is 352.8MB. Perhaps we have just barely > > > and recently crossed a threshold. File an INFRA JIRA and ask about it. > > > Perhaps some limit can be increased, or maybe they will ask us to live > > > within it. > > > > > > Related, looking at the 2.5.8 hadoop3 bin tarball, the majority of the > > > bulk > > > is ./lib/shaded-clients/ . The shaded clients are certainly useful but > > > probably are not the most popular options when taking a dependency on > > > HBase. Perhaps we can package these separately. We could exclude them from > > > the convenience tarballs as they will still be available from the Apache > > > Maven repository. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:33 PM Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I got most of the way through, but failed during publish-dist: > > > > > > > > Transmitting file data ..svn: E175002: Commit failed (details follow): > > > > svn: E175002: PUT request on > > > > > > > > > > > '/repos/dist/!svn/txr/68050-1le9/dev/hbase/2.6.0RC0/hbase-2.6.0-hadoop3-bin.tar.gz' > > > > failed > > > > > > > > Running manually, it looks to be a Request Entity Too Large. The file in > > > > question is 356MB. Anyone have any experience with this? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:19 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > HBASE-28444 has been resolved. > > > > > > > > > > Please go ahead to cut 2.6.0RC0, really a long journey :) > > > > > > > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2024年3月20日周三 14:29写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a security issue for zookeeper, but simply upgrading > > > > > > zookeeper will break a test. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pelase see HBASE-28444 for more details. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should get this in before cutting the RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@apache.org> 于2024年3月19日周二 23:51写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've finished auditing fixVersions and run ITBLL for an extended > > > > > period of > > > > > > > time in a real cluster. I'm not aware of any open blockers. So > > > > > tomorrow I'm > > > > > > > going to start generating the RC0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any concerns or reason for delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew > > > > > > Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles - > > > It's what we’ve earned > > > Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long? > > > Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on > > > - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse > > >
