Our production environment is also on java21 already. +1 for Jdk 17. Regards, Dieter ________________________________ From: Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@apache.org> Sent: 13 June 2024 13:30 To: dev@hbase.apache.org <dev@hbase.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then java21. On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <reidchan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on JDK17 for 3.x > > My vote is based on production experiences. > > Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year in my > production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW, > switched to jdk 21 already) > > > ------ > > Best regards, > R.C > > > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org> wrote: > > > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release > > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase. > > > > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase > > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk > > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there > > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly. > > > > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to > > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17? > > > > Suggestions are welcome. > > > > Thanks. > > > > 1. > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fy0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5&data=05%7C02%7Cdieterdp%40ngdata.com%7C05e75c702e0a4b1d67e508dc8b9c4409%7Cbe7affe0d1e145ca9c69fddf0939a55a%7C0%7C0%7C638538750501409897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n33Cksfy4kp5tD%2FPDe%2FI4zW30z6WfPSO2wiRrD6NmHs%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5> > > >
