Are we ready to make the 2.6.1 release now?

Are there any remaining issues that need to be addressed?

Thanks.

Dieter De Paepe <diete...@ngdata.com.invalid> 于2024年7月2日周二 22:53写道:
>
> I found 2 more possible causes for data loss when using multiple backup 
> roots. These should also be included in the 2.6.1 in my opinion. 
> Unfortunately, I only had time to fix one of them:
>
>
>   *   HBASE-28705 (PR available)
>
>   *   HBASE-28706
>
> Regards,
> Dieter
> ________________________________
> From: Dieter De Paepe <diete...@ngdata.com.INVALID>
> Sent: 10 June 2024 15:29
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Blockers for 2.6.1
>
> Hi Bryan,
>
> I suggest to add HBASE-28389, and possibly HBASE-28103 to the list as well, 
> as they both cause some kind of broken functionality.
>
> Regards,
> Dieter
> ________________________________
> From: Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@apache.org>
> Sent: 05 June 2024 21:34
> To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Blockers for 2.6.1
>
> Hey all,
>
> It's been 2 weeks since 2.6.0 was released. As discussed in the vote
> thread, there were a few outstanding backup-related issues. I believe we've
> made some progress on some of those.
>
> I'd like to start compiling a list of important backup-related fixes to
> target for the 2.6.1 release so that we can track progress. Can those of
> you who are involved (Ray Mattingly, Nick Dimiduck, Dieter De Paepe & team,
> and any others) please list any important jiras here?
>
> With a list of jiras in hand, we can check to make sure blockers &
> fixVersions are set and use that to track what we need to drill down before
> releasing.
>
> Here's what I know of so far, let me know if I'm missing anything:
>
> Not yet started:
> - HBASE-28084: incremental backups should be forbidden after deleting
> backups
> - HBASE-28602: Incremental backup fails when WALs move
> - HBASE-28462: (similar to ^, but in a different part of the code)
> - HBASE-28538: BackupHFileCleaner is very expensive
>
> Patch available:
> - HBASE-28539: backup merging does not work when using cloud storage as
> filesystem
> - HBASE-28562: another possible failure cause for incremental backups +
> possibly cause of overly big backup metadata
>
> Resolved:
> - HBASE-28502: backed up tables are not listed correctly in backup
> metadata, which causes unreliable backup validation
> - HBASE-28568: the set of tables included in incremental backups might be
> too big

Reply via email to