I've trimmed down the remaining Jiras for 2.6.1 to this list of 5. Several of them have already merged to master and are in the process of backports. The only one I'm considering a blocker is the backup issue. I believe that we could use some test support on 28803 and 28850.
If you have any other fixes that are close and you'd like to see included, please @-mention me or reply on this thread. Next up is to review the nightlies and isolate any egregious failures. I intend to ITBLL the tip of branch-2.6 in the next couple of days. With luck, we'll have an RC next week. Thanks for your support, Nick https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:50 AM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > I've filed a tracking ticket for burning down towards 2.6.1. Anyone who > would like to participate, please assign a subtask to yourself. If i've > forgotten any steps, please add them as well. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28847 > > Thanks, > Nick > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 4:21 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks Bryan and Nick. >> >> I could also help if needed. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> 于2024年9月15日周日 01:14写道： >> > >> > I agree — we’re due. >> > >> > On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 at 17:05, Bryan Beaudreault < >> bbeaudrea...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Sorry for the delay, I've been too busy with other things and expect >> that >> > > to continue for a while. I’ve spoken to Nick Dimiduk and he’s going >> to take >> > > over as RM for 2.6. I expect next week he’ll be able to get a sense >> of any >> > > outstanding blockers and set a date for the release. >> > > >> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 10:47 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Bump. >> > > > >> > > > Are we ready for the 2.6.1 release now? We have delayed too much >> till >> > > > now... >> > > > >> > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2024年8月5日周一 22:20写道： >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks Bryan! >> > > > > >> > > > > Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@apache.org> 于2024年8月5日周一 20:59写道： >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Ray is out on holiday right now, and should be returning next >> week. >> > > I'm >> > > > > > waiting for him and the team to give an update on their >> > > backups-related >> > > > > > fixes and reviews of Dieter's work. I've been a bit busy with an >> > > > important >> > > > > > internal project, so haven't had as much bandwidth myself. Once >> those >> > > > final >> > > > > > issues are merged, I'm happy to do another release >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) < >> > > palomino...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Are we ready to make the 2.6.1 release now? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Are there any remaining issues that need to be addressed? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dieter De Paepe <diete...@ngdata.com.invalid> 于2024年7月2日周二 >> > > 22:53写道： >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I found 2 more possible causes for data loss when using >> multiple >> > > > backup >> > > > > > > roots. These should also be included in the 2.6.1 in my >> opinion. >> > > > > > > Unfortunately, I only had time to fix one of them: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > * HBASE-28705 (PR available) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > * HBASE-28706 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > > > Dieter >> > > > > > > > ________________________________ >> > > > > > > > From: Dieter De Paepe <diete...@ngdata.com.INVALID> >> > > > > > > > Sent: 10 June 2024 15:29 >> > > > > > > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org <dev@hbase.apache.org> >> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Blockers for 2.6.1 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Bryan, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I suggest to add HBASE-28389, and possibly HBASE-28103 to >> the >> > > list >> > > > as >> > > > > > > well, as they both cause some kind of broken functionality. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > > > Dieter >> > > > > > > > ________________________________ >> > > > > > > > From: Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > Sent: 05 June 2024 21:34 >> > > > > > > > To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> >> > > > > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Blockers for 2.6.1 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hey all, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > It's been 2 weeks since 2.6.0 was released. As discussed in >> the >> > > > vote >> > > > > > > > thread, there were a few outstanding backup-related issues. >> I >> > > > believe >> > > > > > > we've >> > > > > > > > made some progress on some of those. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I'd like to start compiling a list of important >> backup-related >> > > > fixes to >> > > > > > > > target for the 2.6.1 release so that we can track progress. >> Can >> > > > those of >> > > > > > > > you who are involved (Ray Mattingly, Nick Dimiduck, Dieter >> De >> > > > Paepe & >> > > > > > > team, >> > > > > > > > and any others) please list any important jiras here? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > With a list of jiras in hand, we can check to make sure >> blockers >> > > & >> > > > > > > > fixVersions are set and use that to track what we need to >> drill >> > > > down >> > > > > > > before >> > > > > > > > releasing. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Here's what I know of so far, let me know if I'm missing >> > > anything: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Not yet started: >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28084: incremental backups should be forbidden after >> > > > deleting >> > > > > > > > backups >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28602: Incremental backup fails when WALs move >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28462: (similar to ^, but in a different part of the >> > > code) >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28538: BackupHFileCleaner is very expensive >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Patch available: >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28539: backup merging does not work when using cloud >> > > > storage as >> > > > > > > > filesystem >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28562: another possible failure cause for >> incremental >> > > > backups + >> > > > > > > > possibly cause of overly big backup metadata >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Resolved: >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28502: backed up tables are not listed correctly in >> > > backup >> > > > > > > > metadata, which causes unreliable backup validation >> > > > > > > > - HBASE-28568: the set of tables included in incremental >> backups >> > > > might be >> > > > > > > > too big >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
