[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569729#action_12569729
 ] 

Roland Weber commented on HTTPCLIENT-750:
-----------------------------------------

If the unsecure connection is through a proxy, upgrading it requires to tunnel 
the connection first. So not only the security flag but also the tunnelled flag 
in HttpRoute causes problems. I may have to reconsider the concept on a higher 
level.

cheers,
  Roland


> manage connections with upgradeable security
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-750
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-750
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: HttpConn
>            Reporter: Roland Weber
>            Assignee: Roland Weber
>             Fix For: 4.0 Alpha 4
>
>
> RFC 2817 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2817) specifies not only tunnelling 
> of TLS/SSL via proxies, but also upgrading an existing HTTP connection to 
> TLS/SSL. The latter is not commonly used for communication with traditional 
> HTTP servers, but part of other protocols like IPP that are based on HTTP.
> The current connection management code assumes that a route planner can 
> determine in advance whether a connection will be secure or not. A connection 
> manager will not reuse an existing unsecure connection if a secure connection 
> is requested. It probably also doesn't consider a returned connection secure 
> if it wasn't requested for a secure route.
> One way to improve the situation is to give HttpRoute a trinary security 
> flag, with values plain/secure for the current usage scenario and a new value 
> upgradeable for the new scenario. The two scenarios won't mix, but that is 
> probably not required.
> We have to make sure that upgrade to security of an existing plain HTTP 
> connection is correctly tracked and either respected or suitably ignored by 
> the connection manager. If the security flag of the route is 'upgradeable', 
> mixing of scenarios is not required, and the actual security level can be 
> obtained from the connection itself, it is probably safe to let the 
> connection manager ignore it.
> cheers,
>   Roland

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to