On 23/05/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > We finally need to make a decision on the logging toolkit we are going > to use in HttpClient 4.0 onwards.
I agree that the decision needs to be final - but first it has to be static ;-) > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-416 > > Here's my suggestion about the course of action we should take > > (1) I'll start a poll on the user list about popular opinion on the > matter and propose three alternatives: > > * keeping commons-logging > * migrating to slf4j > * migrating to j.u.logging > > (2) Let the poll run for a week or so and get the users express their > preferences and opinions. > > (3) Tally the votes > > (4) Hold a formal vote on the dev list on two most popular options > > (5) Make a decision and stick to it > > Any objections to that? My view is if it ain't broke, don't fix it - the corolllary is that the poll needs to ask for specific reasons why a change would be an improvement, not just a popularity contest of the logging systems, because that tends to be influenced by what one is used to. > Evil Comrade Oleg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
