[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575525#comment-13575525
 ] 

Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCLIENT-1318:
-----------------------------------------------

> However, the network between the client and the proxy may not be trusted - 
> there could be eavesdroppers lurking! 

True, but this is what SSL tunneling is for. Once a tunnel is fully established 
data flows from the client via the proxy to the target fully encrypted. Secure 
connection to a proxy can only be needed to secure proxy credentials in case of 
BASIC authentication. This might be useful in some bizarre circumstances, but 
in this case what is the point of using a proxy in the first place? I am also 
not aware of any browsers that can support it.

Oleg 
                
> Redirect to TLS site via TLS proxy fails - incorrectly marked as insecure 
> target route
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-1318
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1318
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HttpClient
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.3
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Adam Fisk
>             Fix For: 4.2.4
>
>
> When configured to use a TLS proxy to a target site that is also TLS with a 
> redirect response, HttpClient will incorrectly create a new target route 
> marked as http and insecure rather than https and secure when generating the 
> new request to the redirected location. This will result in exceptions like 
> the trace below with: 
> "Unable to establish route: planned = 
> {}->https://localhost:7777->http://www.exceptional.io; current = 
> {s}->https://localhost:7777->http://www.exceptional.io";
> In fact, the test producing that exception is targeting 
> https://www.exceptional.io not http://www.exceptional.io, which is apparently 
> correctly determined in the original request but not in the redirected 
> request. One candidate for the suspect code is line 1112 of handleResponse in 
> DefaultRequestDirector where the following line:
> HttpHost newTarget = URIUtils.extractHost(uri);
> creates a new target that is always HTTP regardless of whether or not the 
> original target was HTTPS, with havoc ensuing from there. This is 
> reproducible in this test over at LittleProxy:
> https://github.com/adamfisk/LittleProxy/blob/master/src/test/java/org/littleshoot/proxy/EndToEndStoppingTest.java
> org.apache.http.client.ClientProtocolException
>       at 
> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:909)
>       at 
> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:805)
>       at 
> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:784)
>       at 
> org.littleshoot.proxy.EndToEndStoppingTest.runSiteTestWithHttpClient(EndToEndStoppingTest.java:167)
>       at 
> org.littleshoot.proxy.EndToEndStoppingTest.testWithHttpClient(EndToEndStoppingTest.java:92)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
>       at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
>       at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
>       at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
>       at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
>       at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
>       at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
> Caused by: org.apache.http.HttpException: Unable to establish route: planned 
> = {}->https://localhost:7777->http://www.exceptional.io; current = 
> {s}->https://localhost:7777->http://www.exceptional.io
>       at 
> org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.establishRoute(DefaultRequestDirector.java:846)
>       at 
> org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.tryConnect(DefaultRequestDirector.java:649)
>       at 
> org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.execute(DefaultRequestDirector.java:480)
>       at 
> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:906)
>       ... 27 more

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to