On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 12:12 +0100, sebb wrote: > On 21 September 2014 11:58, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 11:54 +0100, sebb wrote: > >> On 21 September 2014 11:22, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 00:52 +0100, sebb wrote: > >> >> On 20 September 2014 13:49, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 08:37 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> >> >> I do not understand why there is not a link to a pre-built site for > >> >> >> this RC. > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Website is not a release artifact and is not a part of the release > >> >> > process. > >> >> > >> >> No, but the RM is expected to run at least the RAT and Clirr reports, > >> >> and include them in the vote e-mail to show that these have been done. > >> >> > >> > > >> > mvn clirr:check apache-rat:check > >> > >> That does not show the output. > >> > > > > It performs necessary validation. > > I meant that showing the command needed to check the release does not > document that it has been run as part of the release checking, nor > does it document the result of running the check. >
We only vote on source tarball and nothing else. Source tarball either meets certain criteria or it does not. But as I said before you are welcome to extend release tools to generate whatever reports you desire. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
