On 21 September 2014 13:44, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On September 21, 2014 1:39:40 PM CEST, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>On 21 September 2014 12:27, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 12:12 +0100, sebb wrote: >>>> On 21 September 2014 11:58, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> >>wrote: >>>> > On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 11:54 +0100, sebb wrote: >>>> >> On 21 September 2014 11:22, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> >>wrote: >>>> >> > On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 00:52 +0100, sebb wrote: >>>> >> >> On 20 September 2014 13:49, Oleg Kalnichevski >><[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >> > On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 08:37 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> >> >> >> I do not understand why there is not a link to a pre-built >>site for this RC. >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Website is not a release artifact and is not a part of the >>release >>>> >> >> > process. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> No, but the RM is expected to run at least the RAT and Clirr >>reports, >>>> >> >> and include them in the vote e-mail to show that these have >>been done. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > mvn clirr:check apache-rat:check >>>> >> >>>> >> That does not show the output. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > It performs necessary validation. >>>> >>>> I meant that showing the command needed to check the release does >>not >>>> document that it has been run as part of the release checking, nor >>>> does it document the result of running the check. >>>> >>> >>> We only vote on source tarball and nothing else. Source tarball >>either >>> meets certain criteria or it does not. >> >>Those criteria must include RAT and should include Clirr. > > Yes, just do > > mvn clirr:check apache-rat:check
>> >>> But as I said before you are welcome to extend release tools to >>generate >>> whatever reports you desire. >> >>Just because I report an issue with a process does not mean I have to >>be the one to fix it. >> > > Right. Naturally it is better to have other people do useless work than do > useless work yourself. It is not useless work. The RM must - and reviewers should - run the RAT and Clirr checks. This needs to be documented as part of the release voting. > Oleg > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
