On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 13:40 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:24 PM Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 10:27 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > 
> > > This is now in git master but I think I need another tweak: I
> > > made
> > > the
> > > return type for HttpRequests the class HttpUriRequestBase instead
> > > of
> > > an
> > > interface. I left ClassicHttpRequests to return
> > > ClassicHttpRequest
> > > but now
> > > I wonder if it would not be more flexible to make it return
> > > HttpUriRequestBase
> > > as well. Thoughts?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Gary
> > 
> > I am sorry it was not quite clear what exactly I had meant. I just
> > wanted to have a similar enum applicable to the async methods that
> > use
> > generic HttpRequest / HttpResponse classes.
> > 
> > I tweaked your code slightly. Please have a look.
> > 
> 
> Hi Oleg,
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> The remaining question is what should be the return type for
> ClassicHttpRequests.create(URI):  ClassicHttpRequest or
> HttpUriRequestBase?
> 

I suppose it should have been HttpUriRequestBase. Corrected.

http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents-client/commit/0abadca8

Oleg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org

Reply via email to