[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16590175#comment-16590175
 ] 

Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCLIENT-1942:
-----------------------------------------------

[~rschmitt] I am unable (or not intelligent enough) to post comments on your 
code without a pending PR. I'll mention a few things here.

1. Can we remove compile dependency on {{io.reactivex.rxjava2}} or at least 
make it optional?
 2. {{ReactiveResponseConsumer}} with multiple futures feels funny. Why not 
using a simple {{Consumer}} to signal availability of {{Message<HttpResponse, 
Publisher<ByteBuffer>>}} after all? It can always stick it into a Future if 
necessary.
 3. Why not returning {{Future<HttpResponse>}} instead of {{Future<Void>}}?

Oleg

> Add support for Reactive Streams
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-1942
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1942
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: HttpClient (async)
>    Affects Versions: 5.0 Beta1
>            Reporter: Ryan Schmitt
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: stuck, volunteers-wanted
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> It would be very helpful to me if the Apache client provided an 
> implementation of the [Reactive Streams|http://www.reactive-streams.org/] 
> spec, particularly as an implementation of the standard 
> [interfaces|https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.reactivestreams/reactive-streams/1.0.2/jar].
>  These interfaces are JDK6-compatible and have no other dependencies, but 
> they unlock interoperability with many other frameworks, such as RxJava.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to