On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 15:34 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:09 PM Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On October 2, 2018 9:57:40 PM GMT+02:00, Michael Osipov < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 2018-10-01 um 16:33 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > > > Also, since we are here, in the same place: "Header > > > > getSingleHeader(String)", could be be "getHeader(String)"; > > > > since the > > > > "Single" is implied by the singular "Header" in the API name > > > > _and_ by > > > > > > the > > > > return type. > > > > > > > > Thoughts on that one? > > > > > > Makes sense to me. > > > > > > > That will break a lot of people's code. Please at the very least > > deprecate > > all methods. > > > > IMO, deprecating code from one beta to another is over the top and > when do > you remove the methods, in another beta? >
I imagine such methods could be removed at any point before the first GA release. I do not understand why making an upgrade to the next BETA simpler for every single HC 5.0 user out there is not worth one extra commit. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
