On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 20:11 +0100, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 20:04 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > Wait a second. I am not sure what release vote you are referring
> > > to.
> > > Web site publishing is not subject to any kind of vote.
> > 
> > I was not talking about website vote, but about a release vote,
> > e.g., 
> > core 4/5, client 4/5. Along with that staged release there goes a
> > staged 
> > site. See this vote: 
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/202011.mbox/%3C6d098deb-00ab-ec01-1c0f-73748462d521%40apache.org%3E
> > 
> > When the vote passes for the release, you complete the staged
> > release
> > as 
> > well as promote the staged site.
> > 
> > Is that better?
> > 
> 
> I am not sure. Web site publishing should not be related to any vote
> at
> all. I should be able to take any officially released artifact and
> republish its content at any point of time, add more content or fix
> things. That should never require a new release of any sort.
> 

In other words one should be able to contribute new content to an
already released component, say, a performance optimization guide,
submit a PR against the web site project and a committer should be able
to review the PR, hit merge and get the damn thing published
immediately.

Oleg 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to