On Tue, 2026-01-27 at 16:37 -0800, Ryan Schmitt wrote: > FYI, AssertJ 4 is going to require Java 17, which would prevent us > from > testing on Java 8 and 11. We'll have to stay on the 3.x line, and I > don't > know how long it will be maintained once 4.0.0 is released. AssertJ > also > pulls in a newer version of byte-buddy than what we currently have > through > Mockito. Overall, I think it's a low-risk change. I'd be a bit more > hesitant about rewriting all our Hamcrest usage, since that can > introduce > subtle test bugs. It can also make cherry-picking a chore. >
I am happily happy to stay with the 3.x line. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
