I think it would be even better than simple JUnit.
Arturo On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 6:17 PM Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2026-01-27 at 16:37 -0800, Ryan Schmitt wrote: > > FYI, AssertJ 4 is going to require Java 17, which would prevent us > > from > > testing on Java 8 and 11. We'll have to stay on the 3.x line, and I > > don't > > know how long it will be maintained once 4.0.0 is released. AssertJ > > also > > pulls in a newer version of byte-buddy than what we currently have > > through > > Mockito. Overall, I think it's a low-risk change. I'd be a bit more > > hesitant about rewriting all our Hamcrest usage, since that can > > introduce > > subtle test bugs. It can also make cherry-picking a chore. > > > > I am happily happy to stay with the 3.x line. > > Oleg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
