+1 I would agree with the below assessment. Cheers, Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, November 8, 2014 at 11:32 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: November report and a few questions >On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Rahul Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi devs >> >> As you've noticed there was little to no activity on HDT over the last >> couple of months. I think it has lost interest of people involved with >>it. >> I am not sure but due to lack of an active community I think it's best >>if >> we retire the project. >> >> Relevant IPMC guide to retirement: >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html > >I'd have to agree with that. Btw, reiterement doesn't mean >the project can't be resuscitated later. The code still exists >in the attic. > >As for the formalities, lets run a [VOTE] thread on the private@hdt >and see what the consensus will be. > >Rahul, any chance you can start the vote? > >Thanks, >Roman.
