I have filed the report for November and will start a vote to Retire HDT. regards Rahul
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 I would agree with the below assessment. > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, November 8, 2014 at 11:32 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: November report and a few questions > > >On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Rahul Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi devs > >> > >> As you've noticed there was little to no activity on HDT over the last > >> couple of months. I think it has lost interest of people involved with > >>it. > >> I am not sure but due to lack of an active community I think it's best > >>if > >> we retire the project. > >> > >> Relevant IPMC guide to retirement: > >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html > > > >I'd have to agree with that. Btw, reiterement doesn't mean > >the project can't be resuscitated later. The code still exists > >in the attic. > > > >As for the formalities, lets run a [VOTE] thread on the private@hdt > >and see what the consensus will be. > > > >Rahul, any chance you can start the vote? > > > >Thanks, > >Roman. > >
