Thanks for bringing it up! Too many things going on and we haven't got time to update the license text yet. We will work on it.
This is the first update on the NOTICE file. Does it look ok this way? https://github.com/apache/incubator-heron/pull/2878 Thanks in advance. On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > See https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-moveothercopyright > > Copyrights go in the NOTICE and not the source. > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 1, 2018, at 6:47 PM, Karthik Ramasamy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Taylor - > > > > As Ali pointed out these are pending task items. One of the major task > that > > we finished is converting the namespace from com.twitter.heron to > > org.apache.heron. > > > > Sree is working on converting the copyrights to use Apache copyrights. > One > > of the question he had is whether the copyright can use one line or it > > should be multi line. > > > > It will be great if you could provide advice on this - so that we can > > change the copyright accordingly. > > > > cheers > > /karthik > > > > > >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Ali Ahmed <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Taylor , > >> > >> There are some tasks pending in this regard , the goal is to remove all > >> twitter copyright headers soon , some of the commits are in and some are > >> remaining . > >> > >> -Ali > >> > >>> On May 1, 2018, at 5:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Heron PPMC, > >>> > >>> I’ve mentioned this before, but IMO, this practice needs to stop. > >>> > >>> The community default seems to be to apply the Apache license header > >> with a twitter copyright assertion on all files, even ones copied from > >> other ALv2-licensed projects. > >>> > >>> Twitter can’t assert copyright on code their employees didn’t create, > >> though, at least in this project, they continue to do so. I find this > >> practice unacceptable. > >>> > >>> Please reconsider even including “Copyright Twitter $date” at all in > >> license headers. That’s more suitable for the NOTICE file, and removed > from > >> the source header. > >>> > >>> Aside from having a twitter account, I have no affiliation with > twitter. > >> As a mentor I was surprised and disappointed to see a Twitter copyright > >> applied to my own (implicitly copyrighted) work. That’s not cool, nor > >> really (IANAL) legal. > >>> > >>> I would appreciate if this could be corrected. This kind of thing is > >> something podlings need to know how to address proactively. > >>> > >>> -Taylor > >> > >> >
