>From a different perspective, 0.14.1/0.15 proposal allow us to release independently and concurrently. Once they are leased, we can have a consented 1.0 release.
On the other hand, 1.0/1.1 would force us to wait to release 1.1 after 1.0 is released. This dependency seems artificial and can be avoided. Thanks, Xuefu On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > In all of my experience at Apache, I have been encouraged to release. > Contributors rightly want to see their hard work gets in the hands of the > users. That's why they contribute after all. Many contributors who have > features in trunk would like get those features out into the community. > This is completely reasonable of them. After all they've invested > significant time in this work. > > Thus I don't feel we should delay getting their contributions released > while we debate 1.0. The two have nothing todo with each other. I've > mentioned on the list and in person to Thejas that I wanted this release to > specifically avoid the 1.x discussion so it did not get bogged down in the > 1.x discussion. Again, this is completely reasonable. > > In short, everything I have experienced at Apache indicates that the folks > who want to release 0.15 should be free to do the work to make that happen. > > Brock > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > Brock, > > > > Given there isn't consensus on numbering yet, could you holding off > making > > the 0.15 branch. We should come to a conclusion on whether we're doing > > 0.14.1/0.15 or 1.0/1.1 before assigning anymore numbers. > > > > Alan. > > > > Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> > > January 20, 2015 at 21:25 > > Just a reminder that I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start > > rolling release candidates on 2/9/2015. After branching I plan on > > merging only blockers. > > > > Brock > > Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> > > January 12, 2015 at 14:37 > > Hi, > > > > Projects are instructed in the incubator that releases gain new users and > > other attention. Additionally, as discussed in this forum I'd like to > > increase the tempo of our release process[1]. > > > > As such, I plan on following this process: > > > > 1) Provide two weeks notice of branching > > 2) Provide two weeks to find issues on the branch and merging only > blockers > > 3) Roll release candidates until a release vote passes > > > > As such I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start rolling release > > candidates on 2/9/2015. > > > > Cheers, > > Brock > > > > 1. Note I am not complaining as I did not help with releases until this > > point. > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is > confidential, > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >
