I'm not asking you to slow the work for the release. If you want to
branch, you can branch. What I'm asking is to hold on the numbering
scheme. So you could name the branch 'next' or something and then
rename once we come to agreement. Consensus in the community is
important, and we should avoid things that make that consensus harder.
Alan.
Brock Noland <mailto:br...@cloudera.com>
January 26, 2015 at 9:17
Hi Alan,
In all of my experience at Apache, I have been encouraged to release.
Contributors rightly want to see their hard work gets in the hands of the
users. That's why they contribute after all. Many contributors who have
features in trunk would like get those features out into the community.
This is completely reasonable of them. After all they've invested
significant time in this work.
Thus I don't feel we should delay getting their contributions released
while we debate 1.0. The two have nothing todo with each other. I've
mentioned on the list and in person to Thejas that I wanted this
release to
specifically avoid the 1.x discussion so it did not get bogged down in the
1.x discussion. Again, this is completely reasonable.
In short, everything I have experienced at Apache indicates that the folks
who want to release 0.15 should be free to do the work to make that
happen.
Brock
Alan Gates <mailto:ga...@hortonworks.com>
January 26, 2015 at 7:02
Brock,
Given there isn't consensus on numbering yet, could you holding off
making the 0.15 branch. We should come to a conclusion on whether
we're doing 0.14.1/0.15 or 1.0/1.1 before assigning anymore numbers.
Alan.
Brock Noland <mailto:br...@cloudera.com>
January 20, 2015 at 21:25
Just a reminder that I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start
rolling release candidates on 2/9/2015. After branching I plan on
merging only blockers.
Brock
Brock Noland <mailto:br...@cloudera.com>
January 12, 2015 at 14:37
Hi,
Projects are instructed in the incubator that releases gain new users and
other attention. Additionally, as discussed in this forum I'd like to
increase the tempo of our release process[1].
As such, I plan on following this process:
1) Provide two weeks notice of branching
2) Provide two weeks to find issues on the branch and merging only
blockers
3) Roll release candidates until a release vote passes
As such I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start rolling release
candidates on 2/9/2015.
Cheers,
Brock
1. Note I am not complaining as I did not help with releases until this
point.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
