Thanks for the link to the previous discussion. Much of the previous discussion was about the discussion about git versus subversion. Obviously, we decided to go forward with that. We already have pull requests on github. See the list at https://github.com/apache/hive/pulls
Without the Apache integration, we don't have any way to close those pull requests and none of the discussion flows back into the linked jiras or email lists. .. Owen On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:38 PM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com < kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I personally am a big fan of pull requests which is primarily the reason > for a similar proposal that I made almost a year and half ago[1] :). I > think the consensus we reached at the time was that to move the primary > source code from svn to git(which we did) but still use patches submitted > to JIRAs to maintain a permalink to the changes and also because it's > little harder to treat a pull requests as a patch. > > [1] > http://qnalist.com/questions/4754349/proposal-to-switch-to-pull-requests > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > All, > > I think we should use the github integrations that Apache infra has > > introduced. You can read about it here: > > > > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and > > > > The big win from my point of view is that you can use github pull > requests > > for doing reviews. All of the traffic from the pull request is sent to > > Apache email lists and vice versa. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Owen > > > > > > -- > Swarnim >
