Cool.

I will start investigating these failures.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Thanks Sergio.
>
> Since only bug fixes were going in, I would expect that most failures
> are just a matter of regenerating q files. But certainly, we should
> make sure all tests are passing.
>
> --
> Jesús
>
>
>
> On 9/23/16, 4:23 PM, "Sergio Pena" <sergio.p...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Jesus.
> >+1
> >
> >I will take a look at some jiras useful for it.
> >
> >Btw, many tests are failing on branch-2.1.
> >Are we going to fix them before the release?
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran <
> >pjayachand...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Prasanth
> >>
> >> > On Sep 22, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> <jcamachorodriguez@
> >> hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi team,
> >> >
> >> > Since the release of 2.1.0, there have been more than 170 fixes
> >> > that went into branch-2.1 (awesome!). Thus, I think it is a good
> >> > time to release 2.1.1.
> >> >
> >> > If you would like some other fixes to be included, please tag
> >> > their target version as 2.1.1 so we do not miss them.
> >> >
> >> > If there are no objections, I propose to create an RC next week.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jesús
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to