> On May 4, 2017, 7:20 p.m., Jason Dere wrote:
> > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/DynamicPartitionPruningOptimization.java
> > Line 234 (original), 234 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58973/diff/1-2/?file=1707234#file1707234line234>
> >
> >     is colName ever non-null, after the change on line 226? Was under the 
> > impression that an empty StringBuilder would simply return an empty string, 
> > so this would always be non-null.

Thanks for bringing this up. I will fix it.


- Deepak


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58973/#review173944
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 4, 2017, 7:34 a.m., Deepak Jaiswal wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58973/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 4, 2017, 7:34 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Jason Dere.
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Semijoin Hints should use column name, if provided for partition key check.
> Involves some code refactoring.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/DynamicPartitionPruningOptimization.java
>  b8c01020b7 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/semijoin_hint.q a3cd1d664d 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/dynamic_semijoin_reduction.q.out 
> 1d1f86bfaa 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/dynamic_semijoin_reduction_2.q.out 
> a5fdd90811 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/dynamic_semijoin_reduction_3.q.out 
> 8950b70b09 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/dynamic_semijoin_user_level.q.out 
> b910df4f34 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/semijoin_hint.q.out 388888ef1c 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58973/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Deepak Jaiswal
> 
>

Reply via email to