> On April 20, 2020, 2:19 a.m., Sankar Hariappan wrote:
> > itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hive/jdbc/AbstractTestJdbcGenericUDTFGetSplits.java
> > Lines 181 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72379/diff/1/?file=2223577#file2223577line181>
> >
> >     Add test for limit with predicates, groupby queries as well. Also, make 
> > sure, we have partitioned table too.
> 
> Adesh Rao wrote:
>     Added queries with predicates and groupby. Since the existing test suite 
> does not have partitioned table, need to go through other tests to figure out 
> the standard way to generate a partitioned table.

done.


- Adesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72379/#review220363
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 21, 2020, 11:17 a.m., Adesh Rao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72379/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 21, 2020, 11:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Sankar Hariappan.
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Since limit constraint was ignored while creating splits. If multiple llap 
> daemons execute splits, output contains more rows than specified by limit 
> constraint.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hive/jdbc/AbstractTestJdbcGenericUDTFGetSplits.java
>  8cbca69737 
>   
> itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hive/jdbc/TestJdbcGenericUDTFGetSplits.java
>  defbe78802 
>   
> itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hive/jdbc/TestJdbcGenericUDTFGetSplits2.java
>  330174513c 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/udf/generic/GenericUDTFGetSplits.java 
> 00a6c89b1e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72379/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Waiting for Hive QA run.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Adesh Rao
> 
>

Reply via email to