Hi All, Seems like we have an agreement. So, unless someone has other ideas, I will cut the branch for 0.9 on 4/9. Below is the consolidated list which people have requested for 0.9, so as and when these gets checked-in trunk, we will merge it back in 0.9.
2084 2764 538 2646 2777 2585 2883 2926 Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 19:02, Thomas Weise <t...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Would be great to get HIVE-2646 included. > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > On 4/2/12 6:59 PM, "Ashutosh Chauhan" <hashut...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Here is a list of jiras which I plan to get in 0.9. > > > > HIVE-2084 > > HIVE-2822 > > HIVE-2764 > > HIVE-538 > > > > I will work with authors of these patches to see these can get in. > Others, > > please feel free to add this list. > > > > Thanks, > > Ashutosh > > > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:39, Carl Steinbach <c...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > >> I'm +1 on doing an 0.9.0 release, but would also like to suggest that we > >> put together a list of 0.9.0 blockers before cutting the release > branch. In > >> the past we have frequently underestimated the amount of work required > to > >> get trunk into a releasable state, with the consequence that we up > wasting > >> time doing a lot of backports from trunk to the release branch. It > would be > >> great if we could avoid all of that this time around. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Carl > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashut...@apache.org > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between > >>> then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be > >> released > >>> and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling > for > >>> 0.9 release. If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for > >> 0.9 > >>> later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and > >> subsequent > >>> release from it. Thoughts? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ashutosh > >>> > >> > >
