[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13747625#comment-13747625
 ] 

Ashutosh Chauhan commented on HIVE-3562:
----------------------------------------

As always, high quality work, Navis! 
Left few implementation comments on phabricator. Most important ones are:
1. Is it possible to use one DataStructure (TreeSet probably) for two 
implementations of ReduceSinkHash. If so, that will simplify this code quite a 
bit.
2. Not sure how RS corresponding to distinct will be handled with this 
optimization. So, I requested for test cases for it.

Cool stuff. Lets get this in!
                
> Some limit can be pushed down to map stage
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-3562
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3562
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Navis
>            Assignee: Navis
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: HIVE-3562.D5967.1.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.2.patch, 
> HIVE-3562.D5967.3.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.4.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.5.patch, 
> HIVE-3562.D5967.6.patch
>
>
> Queries with limit clause (with reasonable number), for example
> {noformat}
> select * from src order by key limit 10;
> {noformat}
> makes operator tree, 
> TS-SEL-RS-EXT-LIMIT-FS
> But LIMIT can be partially calculated in RS, reducing size of shuffling.
> TS-SEL-RS(TOP-N)-EXT-LIMIT-FS

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to