-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22612/#review46008
-----------------------------------------------------------



common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/common/type/HiveDecimal.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22612/#comment81170>

    This doesn't seem specific to the HiveDecimal class. Why not simply make it 
private and move to the class where it is actually being used?



itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/TestDecimal.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22612/#comment81171>

    I think this class is nice. But is it possible to throw in a .q file as 
well with queries testing querying of decimals greater than 9999999999


- Swarnim Kulkarni


On June 16, 2014, 2:06 a.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22612/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 16, 2014, 2:06 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive, Szehon Ho and Xuefu Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-7234
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7234
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> HIVE-7234: Handle nulls from decimal columns elegantly
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/common/type/HiveDecimal.java 
> ad0901548217fbb828a01f8f5edda64581ac2c1e 
>   data/files/decimal_10_0.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   data/files/decimal_9_0.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/TestDecimal.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   serde/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/serde2/lazy/LazyHiveDecimal.java 
> 78cc3819c61f5a1bcb0cdd3425a0105416c26861 
>   serde/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/serde2/lazy/LazyUtils.java 
> 5a4623729ec955bbe8fcf662503b42ff8735eaad 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22612/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added unit tests to test the scenario.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashish Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to