-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28422/#review62913
-----------------------------------------------------------



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/RemoteHiveSparkClient.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28422/#comment105082>

    Could we add an interface at SparkClient and call that directly here? This 
is to be consistent with other methods of similar functionality.


- Xuefu Zhang


On Nov. 25, 2014, 12:08 a.m., Jimmy Xiang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28422/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 25, 2014, 12:08 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Xuefu Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-8855
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8855
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Remote Hive Spark client is enabled to calculate reducer number.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   .gitignore c5decaf 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveSparkClient.java 
> fc63180 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveSparkClientFactory.java 
> 3a89ca6 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/LocalHiveSparkClient.java 
> 4bd3b43 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/RemoteHiveSparkClient.java 
> 93d486f 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/SparkTask.java 3613784 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/SparkUtilities.java 
> e2d129c 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/session/SparkSession.java 
> fe6bce1 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/session/SparkSessionImpl.java
>  650ac11 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/spark/SetSparkReducerParallelism.java
>  f2bb15f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28422/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jimmy Xiang
> 
>

Reply via email to