having milestones on issues seems more important than having them on PRs. thanks for taking the time to dig into this, Hans!
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 10:37 AM <hans.van.akel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > A while back I improved our GH Actions a bit to automatically add the > milestone to a GH Issue when using the .take-issue option. > At that point in time I also thought it was a good idea to do this on our > PR's so we could easily identify which PR's were getting merged for a > milestone. > > Unfortunately it seems doing this is skewing our solved/closed tickets > [1]. I have taken a look at some other projects under the ASF umbrella and > it seems most of them are not tagging PR's with a milestone. I would like > to revert this change (and even change the action to remove a milestone if > one was attached during PR creation). I feel this will give us the best > representation of the actual work done. > > Let me know what you think. > > Cheers, > Hans > > [1] https://github.com/apache/hop/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+milestone%3A2.9 >
