Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ??

[Bill Stoddard]

> At 4:29 PM -0400 8/29/01, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >
> >I still don't grok why SingleListen is needed. In fact, it seems down right 
>dangerous
and
> >I am -1 on this directive until someone bashes me with a clue stick :-)
>
> I agree that it's dangerous... The intent was to make as much of the accept
> mutex configuration runtime as possible, and SingleListen was easy to do...
> Sort of having the capability to adjust during runtime (on or off) on
> a platform by platform basis in real-world conditions.
>
> To my mind, AcceptMutex is key, and if SingleListen needs to go
> then fine

+1 AcceptMutex
-1 SingleListen

Bill