On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote: > To my mind, AcceptMutex is key, and if SingleListen needs to go > then fine... IMHO AcceptMutex already allows you to shoot yourself in the foot. On some platforms also allowing SingleListen shooting would be fine. I'am still trying to actually prove that it does -not- work on Darwin/MacOS-X. (Though on Solaris 2.6 it is easily shown to be deadly). There is certianly (sofar) seems safe to do - and perform well (against ab). Dw
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Bill Stoddard
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Bill Stoddard
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Dirk-Willem van Gulik
