I'm not insulted. If Dave Nagel can take BeOS into the future great.
However from a testing standpoint there are many other platforms out
there which take priority over Be.
As for testing Apache on Be, looks like you and a few others are the
primary focus. Personally I think that Be does some great things, I just
don't know if it's future includes an Apache web server?
Regards
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2.0.26?
Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
It's the attitude and uninformed lot of people such as yourself that is
contributing to the misinformation out there. I'm not slighting you
personally, but I wanted to let you know that BeOS does have a future,
in the eyes of many, from either a financial solution, or a development
one.
http://www.befaqs.com/save just one effort underway at the moment to
help show Palm Inc. that there is indeed a future in the minds of many
in the Community.
If you wish to discuss this offlist, please feel free to contact me
directly.
-Chris Simmons
Avid BeOS user.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>BeOS just got sold to Palm... It's unlikely it's going to become a
>mainstream OS anytime soon.
>
>
>Peter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:19 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Reid
>Subject: Re: 2.0.26?
>
>
>On 29 Aug 2001, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
>> should we re-roll&tar 26 (which would include a patch to worker and
>> ldap_cache, some NW fixes and the apr-dbm change)
>>
>> or just re-tag the 2 files modified as 25 and re tar?
>
>It'd be nice if it built on BeOS. ::prod, prod:: :-) I vote for 26
>tomorrow midday to fix these issues. I'll volunteer to RM since
Ryan's
>already done it once in 24 hours. =-)
>
>--Cliff
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
> Cliff Woolley
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Charlottesville, VA
>
>
>
>
>
