> At least on this front, I'm in total agreement... the httpd-test suite is
> excellent. I've gotten to where I rely on it heavily to test any change I
> make (even small ones) before committing, because it's so good at sniffing
> out the subtle (and not-so-subtle) problems. If everybody used it, we'd
> be set.
Not that I can volunteer right now, but does anyone have an automated
checkout-build-test-repeat engine running? Even on just one platform?
A tinderbox style approach, with a build/test engine that sends mail on
breakage to everyone who committed since the last good build can be a good
way to track how things are going.
- Danny
