Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

[Bill Stoddard]

+1 on the veto :-)

I am a strong +1 in favor of making this a subproject and probably rolling it into a 
post
2.0 release. The presence of mod_gz in the core now -will- impact folks who are 
working on
stabilizing the server.

Bill


> * On 2001-09-06 at 11:51,
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
> >
> >   I am veto'ing this, for now at least.  I will support making mod_gz
> >   a separate sub-project of httpd, and possibly rolling it into a later
> >   release of 2.0, but now is not the time to do this.
>
> Vetos need a valid technical justification, not just an opinion..
> --
> #ken P-)}
>
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>
> "All right everyone!  Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
>