On Thursday 06 September 2001 12:01, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > I am a strong +1 in favor of making this a subproject and probably > > > rolling it into a > > post > > > > 2.0 release. The presence of mod_gz in the core now -will- impact folks > > > who are > > working on > > > > stabilizing the server. > > > > What about putting it in the experimental directory? This way it's > > available for the adventurous, but will not impact on the people who are > > after stability. > > That works for me as long as we do not attempt to integrate it into the > build environment until after 2.0 goes out. The experimentals directory should not be a dumping ground for every module that doesn't get into the core. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Joshua Slive
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jim Jagielski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
